

{"id":5317,"date":"2016-10-18T12:10:24","date_gmt":"2016-10-18T14:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/siteshom.goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/pge-impede-concessao-de-reajuste-indevido-a-servidores-da-sect\/"},"modified":"2016-10-18T12:10:24","modified_gmt":"2016-10-18T14:10:24","slug":"pge-impede-concessao-de-reajuste-indevido-a-servidores-da-sect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/pge-impede-concessao-de-reajuste-indevido-a-servidores-da-sect\/","title":{"rendered":"PGE impede concess\u00e3o de reajuste indevido a servidores da SECT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" size-full wp-image-5316\" src=\"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/dr_-rafael-carvalho-limamateria-dba.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"667\" srcset=\"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/dr_-rafael-carvalho-limamateria-dba.jpg 500w, https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/dr_-rafael-carvalho-limamateria-dba-225x300.jpg 225w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\"><br \/>\n<html><body><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 150%;\"><span style=\"color: #888888; font-size: 12px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Cerca de trinta s<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">ervidores da Secretaria Estadual de Cidadania e Trabalho <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">(SECT), <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">impetraram mandado de seguran&ccedil;a <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">com o <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">objeti<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">vo de conseguirem<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> a concess&atilde;o de reajuste remunerat&oacute;rio de 8% (oito por cento), sob alega&ccedil;&atilde;o de irredutibilidade de vencimentos e direito adquirido.<\/p>\n<p> A Procuradoria-Geral do Estado <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">(PGE)<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> sustentou em ju&iacute;zo que o reajuste n&atilde;o era devido, pois a lei condicionou a sua concess&atilde;o ao aumento real da receita corrente l&iacute;quida do Estado.<\/p>\n<p> A Advocacia Setorial da Secretaria de Gest&atilde;o e Planejamento <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">(Segplan)<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> demonstrou que n&atilde;o houve crescimento real da receita do Estado no per&iacute;odo de 12 meses que antecedeu a pretens&atilde;o vig&ecirc;ncia do reajuste.<\/p>\n<p> Ap&oacute;s defesa da PGE, a 5&ordf; C&acirc;mara C&iacute;vel do <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Tribunal de Justi&ccedil;a do Estado de Goi&aacute;s (<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">TJGO<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">)<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> resolveu denegar a seguran&ccedil;a, pois os servidores n&atilde;o foram capazes de demonstrar o <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">c<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">rescimento da receita.<\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">A<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">o final do julgamento, prevaleceu a tese da Procuradoria no sentido de que os documentos apresentados pelos servidores n&atilde;o provavam o preenchimento da condi&ccedil;&atilde;o prevista em lei para o reajuste.<\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">A contesta&ccedil;&atilde;o foi elaborada pelo Procurador Luiz C&eacute;sar Kimura e o Procurador <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Rafael Carvalho da Rocha Lima<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">esteve presente <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">na<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> sess&atilde;o de julgamento para sustenta&ccedil;&atilde;o oral. &ldquo;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">A<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> decis&atilde;o &eacute; muito importante, pois preserva o esfor&ccedil;o feito pelo governo para manter equilibradas as contas p&uacute;blicas, evitando a situa&ccedil;&atilde;o de colapso pela qual passam outras unidades da Federa&ccedil;&atilde;o. <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Nosso <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> compromisso <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">&eacute; <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">com a defesa do er&aacute;rio e da legalidade <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">de modo que <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">n&atilde;o medir<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">emos<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"> esfor&ccedil;os para conter a&ccedil;&otilde;es judiciais capazes de gerar gastos p&uacute;blicos indevidos&rdquo;, <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">afirmou Rafael. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 150%;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 150%;\"><span style=\"color: #888888; font-size: 12px;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Fonte: Assessoria de Comunica&ccedil;&atilde;o PGE <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cerca de trinta servidores da Secretaria Estadual de Cidadania e Trabalho (SECT), impetraram mandado de seguran&ccedil;a com o objetivo de conseguirem a concess&atilde;o de reajuste remunerat&oacute;rio de 8% (oito por cento), sob alega&ccedil;&atilde;o de irredutibilidade de vencimentos e direito adquirido. A Procuradoria-Geral do Estado (PGE) sustentou em ju&iacute;zo que o reajuste n&atilde;o era devido, pois [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5315,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-noticias"],"rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false],"large":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/41\/2016\/10\/0000-029.png",240,180,false]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"wagner.viana","author_link":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/author\/wagner-viana\/"},"rttpg_comment":0,"rttpg_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/categoria\/noticias\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Not\u00edcias<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"Cerca de trinta servidores da Secretaria Estadual de Cidadania e Trabalho (SECT), impetraram mandado de seguran&ccedil;a com o objetivo de conseguirem a concess&atilde;o de reajuste remunerat&oacute;rio de 8% (oito por cento), sob alega&ccedil;&atilde;o de irredutibilidade de vencimentos e direito adquirido. A Procuradoria-Geral do Estado (PGE) sustentou em ju&iacute;zo que o reajuste n&atilde;o era devido, pois&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5317\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5315"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goias.gov.br\/procuradoria\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}