\n| \n Variáveis selecionadas<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2015<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2016<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Variação<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n <\/span>2016\/2015 (%)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Número de empresas<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6.825<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6.771<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,8<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Pessoal ocupado total<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 238.760<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 224.792<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -5,9<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Total de custos das operações industriais (Mil R$)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 53.412.224<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 56.957.818<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6,6<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Valor bruto da produção industrial (Mil R$)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 83.136.691<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 88.277.653<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6,2<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Valor da transformação industrial (Mil R$)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 29.724.467<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 31.319.835<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,4<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Fonte: IBGE, Diretoria de Pesquisas, Coordenação de Indústria, Pesquisa Industrial Anual.<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n Elaboração: Elaboração: Instituto Mauro Borges \/ Segplan-GO \/ Gerência de Contas Regionais e Indicadores – 2018.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n <\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\nNa análise do pessoal ocupado, na Tabela 2, São Paulo possui o maior número de pessoal ocupado na indústria, 32,9% do registrado nacionalmente. O estado do Rio de Janeiro teve a maior perda de participação absoluta em pessoal ocupado no Brasil, 0,34 pontos percentuais (p.p.).<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n Goiás é o sétimo estado com maior número de pessoal ocupado na indústria, sendo, aproximadamente, 3,1% do total registrado nacionalmente. Ademais, observa-se, no estado, perda de 0,03% nesse número entre 2015 e 2016.<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n \n
<\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n \n\n\n| \n Tabela 2: Pessoal ocupado e participação no total de ocupados no Brasil, segundo Unidades da Federação (2015-2016).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Brasil e Unidades
\n da Federação<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2015<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2016<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Diferença em pontos percentuais<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n 2016\/2015<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Pessoal Ocupado<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Participação (%)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Pessoal Ocupado<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Participação (%)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Brasil<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 7.637.405<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 100,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 7.260.122<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 100,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Rondônia<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 34.501<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,45<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 32.827<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,45<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Acre<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6.379<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,08<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5.189<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,07<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Amazonas<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 104.466<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,37<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 93.737<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,29<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,08<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Roraima<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.514<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,03<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.420<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,03<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Pará<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 104.389<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,37<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 96.140<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,32<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,04<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Amapá<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4.030<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,05<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3.802<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,05<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Tocantins<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 18.525<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,24<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 16.403<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,23<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,02<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Maranhão<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 44.225<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,58<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 40.146<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,55<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,03<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Piauí<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 28.492<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,37<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 26.697<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,37<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Ceará<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 229.663<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 223.243<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,07<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,07<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Rio Grande do Norte<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 65.612<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,86<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 63.053<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,87<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Paraíba<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 77.270<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 71.542<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,99<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,03<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Pernambuco<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 219.913<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2,88<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 206.286<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2,84<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,04<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Alagoas<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 72.878<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,95<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 68.404<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,94<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Sergipe<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 49.879<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,65<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 43.077<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,59<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,06<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Bahia<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 230.944<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,02<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 213.760<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2,94<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,08<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Minas Gerais<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 826.314<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 10,82<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 791.331<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 10,90<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,08<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Espírito Santo<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 133.462<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,75<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 123.027<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,69<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,05<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Rio de Janeiro<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 433.914<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,68<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 387.722<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5,34<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,34<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n São Paulo<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.515.736<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 32,94<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2.406.880<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 33,15<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,21<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Paraná<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 655.519<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,58<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 623.115<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,58<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Santa Catarina<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 650.602<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,52<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 638.854<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,80<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,28<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Rio Grande do Sul<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 675.439<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,84<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 639.896<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8,81<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,03<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Mato Grosso do Sul<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 90.755<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,19<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 93.812<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,29<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,10<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Mato Grosso<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 93.157<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,22<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 94.714<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1,30<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,08<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Goiás<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 238.760<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,13<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 224.792<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3,10<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,03<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Distrito Federal<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 30.067<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,39<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 29.253<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,40<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Fonte: IBGE, Diretoria de Pesquisas, Coordenação de Indústria, Pesquisa Industrial Anual.<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n Elaboração: Elaboração: Instituto Mauro Borges \/ Segplan-GO \/ Gerência de Contas Regionais e Indicadores – 2018.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n \n <\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/span><\/p>\n Quando se trata do número de unidades locais, Goiás ocupa a sétima posição em números absolutos, correspondendo, aproximadamente, a 3,47% do total nacional. Entre os anos de 2015 e 2016, houve um incremento no estado de 0,08% no total de unidades. Vale destacar que esse recuo ocorreu também na análise para o Brasil. <\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n \n <\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n <\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n \n \n\n\n| \n Tabela 3: Unidades locais e participação no total da indústria geral nacional, segundo Unidades da Federação<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n <\/span>(2015-2016)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Brasil e Unidades
\n da Federação<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2015<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2016<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Diferença em pontos
\n percentuais<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Unidades Locais<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Participação (%)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Unidades Locais<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Participação (%)<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2016\/2015<\/p>\n<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Brasil<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 201.223<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 100,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 194.922<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 100,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Rondônia<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.309<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,65<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.220<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,63<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,02<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Acre<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 308<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,15<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 287<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,15<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n -0,01<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n| \n Amazonas<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.196<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,59<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 1.157<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,59<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 0,00<\/p>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |